High Court of Patna
Rajnish Kumar v. Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise
CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE NO.1338 OF 2026
The ruling in brief
Where petitioner challenged adjudication and recovery orders by writ, withdrawal was permitted with liberty to file statutory appeal before Appellate Authority, excluding period spent in writ from limitation computation and allowing condonation, but re-agitation of previously adjudicated contention was not permitted, while all other contentions remained open for appeal consideration.
Where petitioner sought refund of tax recovered during statutory appeal period but filed writ after three months and only within the condonable one-month period, writ registration after defect removal did not cure limitation default, and refund was denied as petitioner failed to approach authority within statutory appeal window prescribed for remedy
Provisions considered
Section 107 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017; Section 78, read with section 107, of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
This summary is for general information and is not legal advice. Read the full decision and the applicable law before relying on it.